top of page
Lowlytics: An AI-assisted enterprise application development platform

An AI-assisted low-code platform designed to simplify enterprise app development, featuring intuitive dashboards, real-time monitoring, and self-documenting code.

Client: A tech startup specialising in developer tools.
Timeline: 4 months (Oct 2024 - Feb 2025).
My Role: Product Designer (Freelance).

Team: Product Manager, Stakeholder, Developer, Product designer
Celestial-Blue.png

Overview

The client wanted a low-code SaaS platform using AI to simplify enterprise app development for non-technical users and developers. The goal was to enable efficient app creation, customisation, and deployment with features like automation, real-time optimisations, and self-documenting code. The platform needed an intuitive interface, seamless collaboration tools, and responsiveness across devices, targeting entrepreneurs, SMEs, and large organisations.

Solution

Lowlytics is a low-code SaaS platform designed to democratise enterprise application development by leveraging artificial intelligence. The platform empowers non-technical users and developers to create, customize, and deploy business applications efficiently. Key features include AI-driven automation, real-time optimizations, and self-documenting code generation. The goal was to enhance productivity, innovation, and accessibility for a diverse user base.

iMac 24 inch.png
iMac 24 inch (1)_edited.png

The problem we solved

Lowlytics is an AI-assisted enterprise application development platform, but enterprise users (developers, managers, and teams) needed a more transparent, structured, and actionable way to interact with AI-generated documentation.

 

​The old approach

  • Documentation was passive, just generated and left there.

  • Developers wanted more control over AI-generated content.

  • Product owners needed insights into development efficiency.

  • Teams struggled with tracking approvals & contributions.

 

Our goal

Make AI-driven documentation more useful, interactive, and collaborative.

WhatsApp Image 2025-02-27 at 14.15.29 (1).jpeg
WhatsApp Image 2025-02-27 at 14.15.28.jpeg

Initial sketches

User Research & Competitive Analysis

 To inform the design decisions, I conducted informal interviews with developers and product managers. I asked about their pain points with existing solutions and what features they valued most. Additionally, I analysed competitors like Firebase and Datadog to identify industry standards and opportunities for differentiation.

 

Key insights included:

  • Users valued customisability in dashboards but wanted default templates for speed.

  • Real-time alerts and error logs were critical for the monitoring tool.

  • Clear, searchable documentation saved teams hours of troubleshooting.

Datadog_logo.svg.png
logo-vertical.png

User Personas

Non-Technical User
Frame 81.png
Developer
Frame 81.png

Pain Points-

  • Struggles with complex tools and technical jargon.

  • Needs guidance to build apps without coding expertise.

Goals-

  • An intuitive, drag-and-drop interface.

  • Real-time feedback to validate designs.

Pain Points-

  • AI-generated docs feel rigid and inaccurate.

  • No quick access to build history or logs.

Goals-

  • Control over AI-generated content.

  • Editable docs and quick reference tools.

User Flow Design

Untitled (2).png

Design System

Frame 43.png
Frame 43.png
Frame 7 (2).png
Frame 7 (2).png
Frame 8 (3).png

Iterations

Documentation Page-Iteration 01
2documentation.png

"How do we know if the code is actually getting better? I need metrics that show progress, not just activity."

Stakeholder

P02.png
P01.png

Project Manager

"Good start, but I need more visibility into progress, not just fixes.''

Documentation Page - Iteration 02
Main documentation.png

"Team insights are great, but can we track how AI improves the code?"

P02.png

Stakeholder

P01.png

Project Manager

""Build times are helpful, but I still need a way to measure code quality.""

Final Design
Main documentation-1.png

Outcome

The project was delivered on time, and early feedback has been mixed but promising. Key highlights from the first month include:

  • Usability: Non-technical users find the platform intuitive, though onboarding could be smoother.

  • Collaboration: Real-time features are helping teams work more efficiently.

  • Feedback: AI-driven tools are appreciated, but some users suggest refining recommendations.

  • Scalability: The cloud-based design is handling current demands well.

Early Metrics

  • ​​User engagement is growing steadily.

  • Non-technical users report faster project setup times.

  • Adoption among target users is progressing well.

​

We’re gathering feedback and working on improvements to enhance the user experience.

Frame 6 (1).png

Contact

+353 894362198

Relevant Links

© 2025, VaidehiKale, IE

bottom of page